• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Best bowling option for Pakistan in WC

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
He played Austrlalia at the start of his career when he wasn't impressive.
No, he played Australia pretty recently and did poorly (and against WI at that stage, too).
And if he failed against England in Onedayers, then he had great success against England in test matches!!
He didn't succeed against England in Tests, he had 1 good game and 1 poor one. Not that that matters, in the slightest, anyhow.
As for matches against India and SL, i hope you understand that a pacer playing on dead subcontinental wkts can't be expected to come up with flying colors in all matches.Naveed has impressive record against India, and his record against SL is also a good one!So much so for ur good game /bad game rubbish.
They can expect to do better than he has - more often than not he's been poor against both India and Sri Lanka. Against Sri Lanka he's had 6 bad games out of 7. Nothing whatsoever you can do to change that.
 

IndianByHeart

U19 Vice-Captain
Err, what? Qadir averaged 38.42 in West Indies where his best game was 8 for two-hundred-and-thirty-one!!!!!!; he averaged 52.10 in New Zealand where he never had a single good game (he took 3 one-fors and once managed 7 for the small matter of one-hundred-and-eighty-seven runs; and he averaged 61 in Australia where, once again, he never had a single good game.

.
Ah, here comes *averages*...LOL!

Qadir played a very important role in the drawn test series in WI, a 38 average isn't all that bad considering that his overall average happen to be 33. He did average 52 against NZ but he took 6/160 against them at Auckland(from 4 tests that he played), also against Aus he took five wkts in Melbourne( from just 5 test that he played)
Note: Qadir was always an expensive bowler, his overall average is near 33, but he took wkts for Pakistan and is regarded as one of the best leggies of the world.Qadir wasn't as great as Warne and batsmen went for runs against him, but he did attack them and took valuable wkts.
 

IndianByHeart

U19 Vice-Captain
There have never been and never will be 11 players who are all good against spin in a line-up. Some of the best Indian batsmen are excellent players of spin, but to suggest, as you are that Indian-cricketer=good-player-of-spin is bull**** of the highest order.

Thats what matches shows, all eleven players played Warne well, go and check it for urself
 

IndianByHeart

U19 Vice-Captain
He didn't succeed against England in Tests, he had 1 good game and 1 poor one. Not that that matters, in the slightest, anyhow.

.

Yeah it shouldn't matter even when we take into account that that performance helped his team to win the important test match!
 

Swervy

International Captain
How do you look one's career's performance? there is nothing as such as good game/bad game ratio which in use, averages are still remains a guide !!
mmm..that would be quite an interesting stat I reckon, as long as it was done in a non-subjective way...might get my thinking cap on!!!!
 

IndianByHeart

U19 Vice-Captain
They can expect to do better than he has - more often than not he's been poor against both India and Sri Lanka. Against Sri Lanka he's had 6 bad games out of 7. Nothing whatsoever you can do to change that.
Bull*** against Lanka he had only 4 poor games, and not 6, had it been 6 poor games out of 7 then his average would have been in 50's against them rather than 25
 

Kriketer

School Boy/Girl Cricketer
Bowling wise, Pakistan would do well as long as Rana Naved is not there. My choice of bowlers are:

Umar Gul
Rao Ifthikhar
Mohammad Sami
Azhar Mahmood
 

FRAZ

International Captain
I guess
Shahid 5
Shoaib Malik 5
Hafeez2-3
Gul 10
Rana Naveed 10
Kaneria 10
Azhar Mahmood 7-8 overs
 

IndianByHeart

U19 Vice-Captain
I guess
Shahid 5
Shoaib Malik 5
Hafeez2-3
Gul 10
Rana Naveed 10
Kaneria 10
Azhar Mahmood 7-8 overs
Hafeez is an underrated bowler, and on present form he's better than the likes of Malik and Naveed.Also i think Afridi need to bowl more than 5 overs, his spell will be crucial for Pakisatan.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Ah, here comes *averages*...LOL!

Qadir played a very important role in the drawn test series in WI, a 38 average isn't all that bad considering that his overall average happen to be 33. He did average 52 against NZ but he took 6/160 against them at Auckland(from 4 tests that he played), also against Aus he took five wkts in Melbourne( from just 5 test that he played)
Note: Qadir was always an expensive bowler, his overall average is near 33, but he took wkts for Pakistan and is regarded as one of the best leggies of the world.Qadir wasn't as great as Warne and batsmen went for runs against him, but he did attack them and took valuable wkts.
Taking wickets is no good if you're going for enough runs to subjegate it. Qadir, in all examples, did.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Thats what matches shows, all eleven players played Warne well, go and check it for urself
Nonsense, tailenders are not good players of anything, never mind quality spin-bowling. There have also been plenty of wholly average Indian batsmen against spin.
 

Top