Neither are remotely close to being the same sport.No. It's stupid to say that football and tennis are as much the same sport as ODI cricket and Test cricket.
Well isn't that just a surprise.It's fascinating that the stupidest arguments on this site of late have tended to involve you.
No, they were beaten in 5 consecutive Tests, a one-off Twenty20 game and 2 ODIs (well, actually 5 ODIs counting previous lossess, and very likely to continue a while, too).England were beaten in 8 consecutive games of cricket. That is all.
Quote of the week, for mine.Neither are remotely close to being the same sport.
If you hit the ball and you are caught, you are out.So tell me - if you ordain to - how are Test and ODI cricket remotely close to being the same sport?
They both use a bat, ball and stumps. That's about it. There are so many differences it's untrue.
And the stricter limitation of overs doesn't cause a whole host of other differences...? So many that countless players can play one form and not the other.
And now, I'm done.Me said:The approach to Test and ODI cricket may be different, but the only major difference between the games itself is that one bears a stricter limitation of overs.
I'd love to get a job, but right now I have essays to write.You two:
Either get a job or a hobby, it's dire.
Annoying Liam and posting on CW don't count for either categories.I have both.
Dunno about Liam...