It'd have to be a wicket keeper of some variety, surely...Goughy said:For England
It would have been Gilchrist a few years ago, and maybe still is.
Tossup between him and Kallis.
I was under the impression that Gilchrist was a keeper. Am I mistaken?It'd have to be a wicket keeper of some variety, surely...
Yeah, I was referring to your "Tossup between him and Kallis." comment. Kallis would be very useful for England as it would allow Flintoff to bat 7 and Read/Jones to bat 8 without disrupting the bowling too much. However their wicket keeping options have been so dire recently that you'd just have to take one..I was under the impression that Gilchrist was a keeper. Am I mistaken?
Agreed, keeping in mind that he has his whole career ahead of him. But if those considerations don't come into play, I'd take Flintoff.For India: Asif
Personally, I'd take Kallis and have Read at 8.Yeah, I was referring to your "Tossup between him and Kallis." comment. Kallis would be very useful for England as it would allow Flintoff to bat 7 and Read/Jones to bat 8 without disrupting the bowling too much. However their wicket keeping options have been so dire recently that you'd just have to take one..