.Another one of these threads?!
That goes without saying.Steve Tikolo.
This. Tragic lack of irrelevant third option.Where's the third option?
I can't believe you actually came up with this poll.No, not that I think it's even close as Tendulkar isn't even the gleam in Bradman's shoe IMO...but I want to know who stands where so we can see who still lives on planet Earth.
Bradman v Tendulkar, who is the better batsman?
Tendulkar by a hundred million miles. Bradman is dead and after rigor mortis set in I can't see him even being slightly competitive.
Darren SammyRicardo Powell.
this is an excellent post.You use the word "is" and therein lies the problem.
It's almost impossible to compare a player of today with a player none of us have ever seen. It's also impossible to compare the game of Bradman's era to the game in Tendulkar's. I honestly think if Tendulkar was chucked in a time machine as he is right now and made to play in Bradman's era there is a good chance he could be a statistical anamoly akin to Bradman, and if the reverse happened I could see Bradman not standing out to the same extent if at all. However that isn't really how it works, your only as good as the time you played in.
Is Tendulkar of the current era better than Bradman in Bradman's day? Maybe, but we have honestly no way of comparing.
That said if Tendulkar was born in Bradman's time I'd say with a great deal of certainity he would have not had the same levels of success as the Don.
5 trolling infraction points to anyone who votes Sachin btw